Affichage des articles dont le libellé est STRENGTH. Afficher tous les articles
Affichage des articles dont le libellé est STRENGTH. Afficher tous les articles

lundi 29 avril 2019

Effect of CSvsTS manipulation on peripheral neural features and grip strength : RCT

Author: Bautista-Aguirre F, Oliva-Pascual-Vaca Á, Heredia-Rizo AM, Boscá-Gandía JJ, Ricard, Rodriguez-Blanco
Published in: Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2017 Jun;53(3):333-341.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:
Cervical and thoracic spinal manipulative therapy has shown positive impact for relief of pain and improve function in non-speci
fic mechanical neck pain. Several attempts have been made to compare their effectiveness although previous studies lacked a control group, assessed acute neck pain or combined thrust and non-thrust techniques.
AIM:
To compare the immediate effects of cervical and thoracic spinal thrust manipulations on mechanosensitivity of upper limb nerve trunks and grip strength in patients with chronic non-specific mechanical neck pain.
DESIGN:
Randomized, single-blinded, controlled clinical trial.
SETTING:
Private physiotherapy clinical consultancy.
POPULATION:
Eighty-eight subjects (32.09±6.05 years; 72.7% females) suffering neck pain (grades I or II) of at least 12 weeks of duration.
METHODS:
Participants were distributed into three groups: 1) cervical group (N.=28); 2) thoracic group (N.=30); and 3) control group (N.=30). One treatment session consisting of applying a high-velocity low-amplitude spinal thrust technique over the lower cervical spine (C7) or the upper thoracic spine (T3) was performed, while the control group received a sham-manual contact. Measurements were taken at baseline and after intervention of the pressure pain threshold over the median, ulnar and radial nerves. Secondary measures included assessing free-pain grip strength with a hydraulic dynamometer.
RESULTS:
No statistically significant differences were observed when comparing between-groups in any of the outcome measures (P>0.05). Those who received thrust techniques, regardless of the manipulated area, reported an immediate increase in mechanosensitivity over the radial (both sides) and left ulnar nerve trunks (P<0.05), and grip strength (P<0.001). For those in the control group, right hand grip strength and pain perception over the radial nerve also improved (P≤0.025).
CONCLUSIONS:
Low-cervical and upper-thoracic thrust manipulation is no more effective than placebo to induce immediate changes on mechanosensitivity of upper limb nerve trunks and grip strength in patients with chronic non-specific mechanical neck pain.
CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT:
A single treatment session using cervical or thoracic thrust techniques is not enough to achieve clinically relevant changes on neural mechanosensitivity and grip strength in chronic non-specific mechanical neck pain.

Effects of Cervical HVLA on ROM, Strength Performance, and Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Review.

Authors: Galindez-Ibarbengoetxea X1, Setuain I2,3, Andersen LL4,5, Ramírez-Velez R6, González-Izal M2, Jauregi A1,7, Izquierdo M2.

Published in: J Altern Complement Med. 2017 Sep;23(9):667-675. doi: 10.1089/acm.2017.0002. Epub 2017 Jul 21.


BACKGROUND:
Cervical high-velocity low-amplitude (HVLA) manipulation technique is among the oldest and most frequently used chiropractic manual therapy, but the physiologic and biomechanics effects were not completely clear.
OBJECTIVE:
This review aims to describe the effects of cervical HVLA manipulation techniques on range of motion, strength, and cardiovascular performance.
METHODS/DESIGN:
A systematic search was conducted of the electronic databases from January 2000 to August 2016: PubMed (n = 131), ScienceDirect (n = 101), Scopus (n = 991), PEDro (n = 33), CINAHL (n = 884), and SciELO (n = 5). Two independent reviewers conducted the screening process to determine article eligibility. The intervention that included randomized controlled trials was thrust, or HVLA, manipulative therapy directed to the cervical spine. Methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. The initial search rendered 2145 articles. After screening titles and abstracts, 11 articles remained for full-text review.
RESULTS:
The review shows that cervical HVLA manipulation treatment results in a large effect size (d > 0.80) on increasing cervical range of motion and mouth opening. In patients with lateral epicondylalgia, cervical HVLA manipulation resulted in increased pain-free handgrip strength, with large effect sizes (1.44 and 0.78, respectively). Finally, in subjects with hypertension the blood pressure seemed to decrease after cervical HVLA manipulation. Higher quality studies are needed to develop a stronger evidence-based foundation for HVLA manipulation techniques as a treatment for cervical conditions.